Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:ThisDude62/sandbox

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was to delete the page. Spebi 04:38, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] User:ThisDude62/sandbox

For starters, this page/subject was deleted at AfD, denied recreation at DRV, denied recreation at DRV again and denied recreation and salted at DRV a third time. This article was presented in almost identical form at the last DRV and it was determined it should be salted. Since then, this userpage version has been linked to the mainspace on several occasions, for example: [1] [2] [3][4][5] [6] Smashville^BONK! 17:20, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

• Strong delete: The page has been salted in article-space. This "sandbox" is clearly being abused to indefinitely preserve deleted material, and worse, it's being linked from article-space. Delete it; if the subject becomes notable, then it should go through WP:DRV first before a new sandbox article is created. MastCell ^Talk 21:08, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
• Delete. Per MastCell, Userspace being used as a repository for deleted material. ><RichardΩ612 21:47, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
• Delete, not a sandbox but an attempt to circumvent AFD/DRV. --Coredesat 23:30, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
• Delete as per nom. User pages are not there to bypass WP:CONSENSUS. ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 19:32, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
• Delete per all above. Clearly being used to bypass consensus.--BelovedFreak 13:50, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.