Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:The Blazing Sword/BJAODN
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete, all three. Daniel Bryant 10:15, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] User:The Blazing Sword/BJAODN
Fork of BJAODN created in user space. Absolutely no reason for this to exist in user space. The talk pages for each of the nominated pages need to go too. Metros232 13:40, 17 March 2007 (UTC) Also nominating:
- User:The Blazing Sword/BJAODN2
- User:The Blazing Sword/BJAODN3
- Delete - my browser doesn't like it at all. This is just a copy of WP:BJAODN... all on three pages. There is no need for this. GracenotesT ยง 20:21, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Not useful. Can't think of any reason to keep these pages. WjBscribe 21:20, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - either a) someone has copied this text from the BJAODN pages or b) someone has way too much time on their hands which could be used to improve the encyclopedia. Obsolete to BJAODN. --tgheretford (talk) 21:43, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete, it's just simple duplication. - 15:13, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete As above. 3lit3man 16:17, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Redundant. YechielMan 20:05, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete as duplication of project page on userspace. Wooyi 04:31, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.