Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Tai Streets/Gang stalking

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was speedy delete (per request by only contributor).

[edit] User:Tai Streets/Gang stalking

For the Deletion Review discussion of this page that is currently in progress, see Wikipedia:Deletion review#User:Tai_Streets.2FGang_stalking.

Recreation of already afd'd article Gang stalking. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gang stalking for previous discussion of this and a set of similar pages. Note also User:Tai Streets. Delete -- The Anome 01:50, 7 January 2006 (UTC)

  • As long as it's within the User namespace, I don't see the problem. Apparently a page created by Will Beback (talk · contribs) to allow Tai Streets (talk · contribs) to edit it up to snuff. — TheKMantalk 02:37, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Speedy-delete again as re-created content. As is being discussed on Deletion Review, there is sufficient evidence to question whether this move into the user namespace was made in good faith. Leave it deleted until the Deletion Review discussion is completed. Rossami (talk) 06:57, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. I created this page (in good faith) in order to give the editor an opportunity to improve the material The editor has shown no interest in doing so, so the page has no purpose. -Will Beback 23:41, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, recreation of deleted content. User space should not be used to dance around consensus or sidestep a valid AfD decision. If the user wishes to keep it, they can put it on their hard drive or a free website somewhere. Also, this sort of tinfoil-hat conspiracy nonsense makes WP look bad (one of the deletions of the original article was done by Jimbo Wales himself)! Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 00:58, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Speedy delete. If "Tai Streets" or "Wyatt Ehrenfels" or "Curt Jurgens" or whatever he's calling himself this week wants to prepare the case that this already-rejected nonsense is actually encyclopedic, let him do it on his own computer. He wants the SEO hits? Go elsewhere. --Calton | Talk 04:31, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.