Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Supersuperidiot

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. bibliomaniac15 Midway upon life's journey... 00:04, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] User:Supersuperidiot

Not an actual editor's page: Only edits (18, all in December 2006) are to this page. PROD tag added, but removed with the comment "Nothing wrong with this page". Nothing other than the standard policy that WP is not a permanent free webhost/MySpace substitute that is. --Calton | Talk 14:30, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

• Keep for two reasons... the first is there is no reason to delete. I don't think this page is particularly free web hosting... it's not the type of thing he'd link his friends to and abuse our bandwidth... so, unless we have compelling proof (an oddly high number of page views during 2007) then I don't think we should start the precedent of deletion. And hinging on the first argument is WP:BITE... sure, he hasn't edited in over a year... but, you never know. gren グレン 14:51, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
• Keep per above statement. Merely having userboxes on one's page does not make it a Myspace substitute, and this person may contribute in the future (or may contribute to other Wiki-projects, perhaps?) --UsaSatsui (talk) 18:50, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
• Keep per my reasoning in the essay Wikipedia:Editors matter. There is a chance this user may at some point return and contribute; in which case, deleting this page might well drive them away. While it is true that the user probably will not return (having been absent for more than a year), leaving the page in place does no harm to the encyclopedia. Thus, no net benefit to Wikipedia would be derived from deleting this page; and as we don't need to worry about server space, we may as well leave it here. Walton^One 21:23, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
• Keep It is just a user page, perhaps not one to be proud of, but a harmless one. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 02:57, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
• Keep Userboxes on a userpage are not a violation of WP:NOT, if they are, we're all in trouble. (BTW, it was 6 mos between my second and third edits on here).--Doug.^{(talk • contribs)} 06:04, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
• Delete User has not edited since December 2006. If they wish to return and make a new page, hey that's great. -Nard 21:50, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.