Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Steth/RfC

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Keep. Xoloz 19:45, 26 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] User:Steth/RfC

Out of time and place. And process. Midgley 23:23, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

• Comment: Steth was just a little confused about the RfC process. I tried to explain the normal method for doing these to him, and have created an appropriate RfC and listed it, see Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Mccready. --Hetar 23:45, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

Rather a long time later, there is still no evidence of efforts to resolve it. Time it went. Midgley 00:37, 19 April 2006 (UTC)

• Weak delete It isn't an evil thing to keep a draft RfC on a subpage in your userspace, but it is confusing when one doesn't even have a userpage proper yet. Xoloz 00:58, 19 April 2006 (UTC)
• Keep by default. All the above are good reasons why this is weird. But unless it's hurting someone, why not let Steth have it there until he/she decides to delete it? We userfy all sorts of out of place stuff in article and project space, so we shouldn't delete stuff in other peoples' user space just because it's out of place. Martinp 13:17, 20 April 2006 (UTC)
• Keep as it is a user page and Wiki-relevant, but suggest to user the creation of a sub-page for it and if necessary, explain how this is created. Tyrenius 02:10, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
• Keep --Terence Ong 13:51, 24 April 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.