Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Sean Canavi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. (Radiant) 10:34, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] User:Sean Canavi

Not an editor's page: Only edits (3, all in May) are to this page. WP is not MySpace/a free webhost. Was tagged with PROD, but removed by User:Doug Bell with the flatly wrong rationale of made incorrect assertion regarding last edits to page (were on Oct. 31st, not in May)--needs to go through MfD. Doug Bell, it turns out, assumes that the contributions of 87.127.74.230 (talk · contribs) are probably User:Sean Canavi -- but since those contributions are equally nonsensical ("I love I love I love I LOVE STEVEN SEAGAL I love I love I love"), I don't see a dime's worth of difference here. Calton | Talk 01:06, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

• Keep. The IP's last edit was November 8, actually, and it wasn't nonsensical. -Amarkov ^blah_edits 01:14, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment could be a shared computer. Koweja 01:14, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
    • Possible. But I'll go through pretty much any contrivance to keep a userpage, I'm pretty liberal with them. It isn't going to matter, of course. -Amarkov ^blah_edits 03:52, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:USER and per the WP:NOT page cited in the nomination. Nothing related to helping build an encyclopedia. The other-than-nonsensical edits were made by, let's see: someone using the "popups" tool to revert a whole bunch of anon edits, and two editors removing copyrighted images per policy. And if the 8-November anon edits weren't "nonsensical" they were almost self-vandalism, or (applying WP:AGF) a fan expressing him/herself and testing Wikipedia editing in the wrong place. Barno 01:27, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

• Comment: This user's talk page shows people inquiring about copyrighted images, with no answer; also Calton's 7-December prod tag's message, with no "justaminute" nor other answer. If the user logged on under this username in Nov/Dec, the "new messages" orange box with link would have been shown. The user is inactive under this name, and if active as anon or another account, the user has abandoned the nominated userpage and its talkpage. Barno 01:34, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. - WP:NOT and WP:BIO come to mind. User has made no contributions outside his userpage. Yuser31415 04:32, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. MER-C 04:56, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
• No opinion except that removing PROD was a reasonable thing to do as the PROD guideline for user pages states: Pages in the User and User talk namespaces may be proposed for deletion if the user has no recent edits... The edits in October may or may not be Sean Canavi, but it's a reasonable step to avoid misuse of PROD to list it here. This is true no matter what level of rudeness is used to describe removing the PROD tag. —Doug Bell ^talk 06:01, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

• If you believe describing someone missing the obvious is "rude", it's certainly no ruder than your pejorative misapplication of the term "misuse" in defending your narrowly bureaucratic reading of the guideline. --Calton | Talk 06:25, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

• Delete As not a web host. If the anon was really Sean Canavi, they are still not a contributer to mainspace. --Dgies 06:31, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - is useful how? Should be at MFD though, too many potential recent contribs for a prod. Better safe than sorry. Moreschi 08:53, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.