Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Samuel Luo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was speedily deleted - page has been recreated with only the puppeteer template. Allowing this debate to run for 5 days seems unnecessary. – Riana ⁂ 10:40, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] User:Samuel Luo

Userpage of an indefinitely blocked editor, serves only as a soapbox. ✔ Olaf Stephanos ✍ 00:39, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

• Delete banned editor with no substantial userpage content except a POV link. Wooyi^{Talk to me?} 01:10, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
• Why bother? Abeg92contribs 02:27, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
• Comment - why bother? The userpage needs to be kept with at least the puppeteer template on it, for record-keeping purposes. Any admin can just delete the page and restore it with the puppeteer template. Do we need a 5-day discussion for this? – Riana ⁂ 03:19, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, have to second the "why bother?", but since it's here we might as well be rid of it. Lankiveil 10:28, 20 May 2007 (UTC).
• Close MfD as unnecessary - these situations are dealt with administratively, and I don't think we want to have a debate here everyone a user is blocked or banned. Newyorkbrad 10:35, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.