Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Rsengage

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete, looking into the images now. – Rianaऋ 08:51, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] User:Rsengage

User space violation; a personal essay. Contribution history shows about 150 edits to this page, five to images, and none to mainspace. Placeholder account 01:41, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

  • Image:Norico Girl.jpg
  • Image:WORKugtuy.jpg (tagged as corrupt)
  • Image:Norico's Dream.jpg (tagged as corrupt)
  • Image:Keyframing.jpg
  • Image:Oniongirl.jpg
  • Image:Story3.jpg
  • Image:Story5.jpg
  • Image:Mystory2.jpg
  • Image:Train and carriage 1.jpg
  • Image:Steam train 4.jpg
  • Image:Red steam train 2.jpg
  • Image:Richard Sutcliffe Catalogue Final Catalogue image RGB.jpg
  • Image:Richard Sutcliffe Catalogue Final Catalogue image.jpg (deleted as corrupted)
Don't forget to delete them as well, as they are equally in breach of the guidelines. MER-C 09:06, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete all as per above comments. Bearian 15:40, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete and point towards a free webhost, which Wikipedia isn't. Tony Fox (arf!) 20:31, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. Also look into the licensing for those images. I've got a funny feeling they're not legit PD. ^demon[omg plz] 20:43, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete as per all above comments. Major misuse of personal page. --MosheA 01:37, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. Regarding the images, Image:Keyframing.jpg, Image:Mystory2.jpg and Image:Richard Sutcliffe Catalogue Final Catalogue image RGB.jpg are clearly not PD. I believe the same is true of Image:Oniongirl.jpg. The train images are created with some rendering software, although I'm not certain which one. They may be PD, or may be copyrighted elsewhere. WP:AGF aside, I think we lose little if we delete them as tainted by association. Serpent's Choice 07:08, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. Lankiveil 12:27, 14 May 2007 (UTC).
  • Delete. Definitely a user space violation. --Mschel 00:06, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.