Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Rosencomet/Grey School of Wizardry

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Keep. Xoloz (talk) 15:54, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] User:Rosencomet/Grey School of Wizardry

Was marked for speedy deletion as spam, it is in userspace and should be discussed. Keilana 23:16, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

• I speedily deleted it under criteria G4, but moved it to userspace after Rosencomet's request for help. As a long-term contributor, I don't have any objection to him working on this material until it is suitable for article space. Marasmusine (talk) 23:27, 18 December 2007 (UTC) Edit: Depending on if the block is resolved or not, meh. Marasmusine (talk) 23:32, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
• Keep per Marasmusine. Page was just userfied 11 hours ago. Give 'em enough rope.--12 Noon ^2¢ 00:05, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

Ah, yeah that block [1] throws a wrench in things.... But they can always create a new account for each user. Will have to see how they react, but they can still re-work the content under a new username I guess. So I will stick with my above "keep" at least for the time being.--12 Noon ^2¢ 00:17, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

I also just noticed that this page, User:Infronics, and User:Smithforkranch were all tagged for speedy as spam by the same IP [2], possibly trying to make a point, then Keilana denied the speedy and brought them here. I am leaning towards thinking the IP noms are in bad faith (nothing against Keilana).--12 Noon ^2¢ 00:28, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

You would be wrong, of course. Have a read of Speedy deletion criterion #G11 -- that's "G", as in "General". I tag several such pages daily, and hey presto, they're all gone.

This page is spam. It was created by a serial spammer who barely escaped ArbCom sanctions for spamming, who was indefinitely blocked for using sockpuppets in an attempt to keep spamming. In short, deletion bait. --221.114.141.220 (talk) 12:57, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

• Keep as well. Hopefully they'll come back as individual accounts and work on it--I have no problem with it staying put for the time being. --jonny-mt 07:38, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
• Keep It isn't doing any harm if it can potentially be expanded. Master of Puppets ^{Care to share?} 04:36, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.