Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Richard0612/sandbox
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Speedy keep. El_C 10:07, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] User:Richard0612/sandbox
Why? Just use the main sandbox instead of creating your own. Also nominating User:Richard0612/tools copy of main tools page and is really unecessary. /\FoffleFoo 22:40, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
- Speedy keep MfD'd by single purpose account. --Majorly (Talk) 22:47, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
- (edit conflict) Speedy keep - many editors have personal sandboxes for drafting, testing, etc. and they are perfectly legitimate. Note: This nomination is nominator's first edit. Newyorkbrad 22:49, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
- Comment. Although my tools section may be a copy of the main one, I find it useful for cleaning up vandalism. Many other users have personal sandboxes, and I don't really see what is wrong with them ><RichardΩ612 UW 22:54, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
- Keep. I see no problem with active users having a few subpages for Wikipedia-related content (useful or not), and strict policy adherents will be relieved to know that the userspace policy already codifies this latitude. When I'm busy in many projects at once, I sometimes have up to nine different sandboxes simultaneously (I currently have three). —{admin} Pathoschild 00:11, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
- Keep per above. IronChris | (talk) 02:35, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
- Keep - What is the purpose of this? Why is this account nominating MFDs when it's never done a single other thing for the encyclopedia? --Cyde Weys 03:50, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
- Keep. Yes, I think I'll try to test some template coding in the main sandbox, only to find that I can't because someone else is using it, too. -Amarkov blahedits 05:54, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.