Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Renandchi3

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep for now. Yamamoto Ichiro 会話 23:58, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] User:Renandchi3

User page is obviously being used for promotional or advertising purposes - WP:SPAM. User has already been warned and blocked temporarily. Wisdom89 (talk) 05:56, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

• Delete, speedy under G11 if possible. —Scott5114↗ [EXACT CHANGE ONLY] 07:07, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
• Weak keep - The page has been blanked already, which to me is enough for the time being. It's worth noting, too, that the user only has a 24-hour block (Luna Santin has the patience of a saint) and, judging by their contributions thus far, may very well be permanently blocked by the time this MfD has run its course. In that case, any deletion arguments would be moot, as any questionable content on their user page would most likely be replaced by {{Indefblockeduser}}. On the other hand, if my string of assumptions proves to be false, it's safe to say that a deleted userpage would only serve to unnecessarily upset the user in question, particularly if they were actively trying to be good. --jonny-mt 07:26, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
• Temp. keep It is probably unfair to nominate while the user is blocked, so I would want to at least let the user opine. Otherwise, since the block was only for 24 hours, that means an admin is giving this user the benefit of the doubt (or enough rope), so I would say let's sit tight for the time being. In spite of the user's atrocious short-lived history, and this request on their talk page (suggesting WP is not for them and they will probably be moving elsewhere soon), I still would not want to delete during his block. Let's see how it goes and maybe bring it back in a week or so (but if he is indef blocked, then speedy it). I think it would have been easier for me to just say "what jonny-mt said".--12 Noon ^2¢ 09:11, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
• Keep status quo as a blanked page. Shalom (Hello • Peace) 18:50, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.