Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Røed/Signatur

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Speedy Keep as it is being appropriately subst:'d and not lenghty. Had this NOT been orphaned or being used, then we'd have an issue to deal with. Speedy closure is without prejudice for future nominations based on policy or guideline reasons. — xaosflux ^Talk 02:48, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] User:Røed/Signatur

User space is not for customized signatures, these should be made in "my preferences" per Wikipedia:Signatures. This signature template is orphaned anyway. Punkmorten (talk) 22:04, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

• Speedy Keep such pages are allowed (read the entire section) if they are substituted, which would produce an orphaned template. I would have said Delete if it had been excessively long (>255 bytes per WP:SIG). --Thinboy00 @147, i.e. 02:32, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
• Keep Many such subpages exist. It is standard to allow them. Shalom (Hello • Peace) 14:35, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
• Keep No, it's hard to make sigs in the prefs, as you can't view a preview. He probably substitues that in as his sig. I hope you put the MFD box in noinclude tags, or there might be some...er...problems...--Phoenix-wiki ^{(talk · contribs)} 22:52, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.