Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Patchouli

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Speedy close, nomination withdrawn, no other delete opinions. -Amarkov ^blah_edits 04:52, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] User:Patchouli

Contents that are unrelated to user namespace. Veil fetishism itself was deleted per this AfD. Hessam 23:52, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

• Strong keep. Did it occur to you to actually discuss this with the user before nominating the entire page for deletion? -Amarkov ^blah_edits 00:05, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Fortunately I did. Hessam
    • Oh, wow. Good for you, I didn't expect that, so I didn't think to check; sorry. Still keep, though, it hasn't been long enough for me to be comfortable. -Amarkov ^blah_edits 00:25, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
      • I respect your opinion but this time keep with no reason? Hessam 00:31, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
        • "It hasn't been long enough [since the AfD] to make me feel comfortable" -Amarkov ^blah_edits 03:34, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
        • I think it has no relation with AfD. This is a user page. WP:UP fully discussed what users can and can not have on their user pages. Hessam 08:26, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
          • The deletion nomination was done by — Intervixen (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. .--Patchouli 08:10, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
          • Yes, you're correct. I believe userpages should be much more allowing than articlespace. -Amarkov ^blah_edits 03:56, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
            • I second this. We should not censor peoples user pages unless there is something defamatory or attacking other users. I think users should have a right to preserve deleted content they have worked hard on in their user area. Thats what its for anyway, since people can work on content in their user pages. Khodavand 07:19, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
• Comment People put deleted content on their user page all the time. This is a spurious move. Khodavand 18:30, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
• Strong keep I might later seek permission from administrators to reinstate the article. Currently, I have put on my user page to allow other users to contribute & solidify the contents.--Patchouli 03:49, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
• Keep, but would the user mind moving it to a subpage (perhaps User:Patchouli/Veil fetishism)? Even if not, WP:USER clearly states that users are allowed to put "in-progress" articles on their user pages and user subpages. Srose (talk) 17:42, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
  • In progress or deleted artciles? Hessam 23:16, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
    • Both, so long as the article is being improved. Endorse close per below. Srose (talk) 19:27, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
• Moved Great suggestion User:Srose. As per WP:BB, I will move to User:Patchouli/Veil fetishism myself, Best wishes, Travb (talk) 02:56, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
• Comment I suggest closure of this MFD because the page in question has been moved to a subpage. If the someone wishes to nominate the subpage for deletion they may but it is no longer neccessary for the userpage to be tagged. James086^{Talk | Contribs} 06:48, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
  • I'm okay with this move. We can close this MfD. Thank you for your attention. Hessam 15:49, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.