Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Nicole 50dc

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete'. Xoloz (talk) 15:10, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] User:Nicole 50dc

Copy on user page of an article that was deleted as a result of its AfD. This copy was used yesterday by the SPA user to recreate the article as Drake-circus (later moved to Drake Circus then CSDed), and should be deleted to help ensure this does not happen again. This is a summary: the full story is getting complex (several page-moves etc.) I'm happy to explain further if this isn't a straightforward request. Smalljim 08:53, 13 November 2007 (UTC)

• Delete: This is an attempt at an end-run around a rather controversial and disruptive couple of AfDs that involved articles which generated a lot of blockings, page protections, sock and meat puppetry, vandalism, WP:COI, personal attacks and downright dishonesty. ---- WebHamster 10:43, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, blatant attempt to subvert AFD. This is simply the version that was a POV fork, before it was quickly rewritten into an article on a non-notable street. The user should probably be blocked. --Coredesat 17:16, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, for reasons given above. -- Hoary 00:47, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Deleted article re-created in user space.--SJP 17:44, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
• Delete recreation. Doczilla 08:40, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - if an article doesn't survive AFD, it shouldn't be in userspace. --BelovedFreak 14:31, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

if an article doesnt survive AfD, of course it can be in userspace if it's being worked on--that's routine, and admins regularly userify articles for the purpose. . But as Smalljim said, in this particular instance it would be better not to have it there--it is indeed an attempt to continue a disruptive set of activities. DGG (talk) 00:33, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

• Delete - No effort a legitimate improvements to a draft article. There was another Drake Circus at User:Smalljim/Drake Circus. -- Jreferee t/c 06:58, 18 November 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.