Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:NeoFreak/sandbox/sandbox5
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Speedy Deleted by NawlinWiki. — xaosflux Talk 02:43, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] User:NeoFreak/sandbox/sandbox5
Early version of controversial article being maintained on user subpage. Propose deletion for the same reasons as the prior discussion at Wikipedia:Miscellany_for_deletion/User:QuackGuru. Please note - similar user subpages will be nominated separately. Risker 03:14, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per genuine concerns as expressed on the QuackGuru MfD regarding user space copies not being properly surveilled for WP:BLP vios. (→Netscott) 03:31, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete as nominator. Concur with Netscott's analysis. Risker 04:08, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, Netscott, and BLP concerns. - Denny 06:16, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
- Neutral this one looks like just a very early draft of the current article. Need to find out user's intention, first and foremost. C.m.jones 06:42, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete as both a content fork and a spin at skirting WP:BLP. Gwen Gale 10:15, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per BLP concerns. Metamagician3000 13:29, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
Note to closing administrator: This page has now been deleted as a CSD:G7. Risker 15:50, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.