Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:NathanShaw (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was speedily deleted, promotional material has no place here. -- nae'blis 21:10, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] User:NathanShaw

Linkspam with blatantly promotional language.

I nominated this page for deletion before; the result was "Relist in a few weeks if there is no activity. Relist immediately if inappropriate user page activity continues". Well, it's now more than 3 weeks after the previous MfD, and a whole month after Nathan Shaw created this page; there's still no activity on the page, and the blatantly promotional linkspam still shows no signs of going away. So I've nominated the page for deletion once more. Bi 18:49, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

• Delete now. -Amarkov ^blah_edits 19:05, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Badbilltucker 19:25, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. MER-C 01:38, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete ... nothing else to be said. Dåvid ƒuchs (talk • contribs) 21:51, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom, like everyone else. --Wizardman 04:45, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete spam. ST47Talk 19:58, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom and everyone who !votes delete :). Yuser31415 03:34, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.