Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Mission BSS

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. — xaosflux ^Talk 03:15, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] User:Mission BSS

Page is a blatant advertisement that I put up for speedy but was informed that despite the fact that it qualifies as a speedy it should be taken here as it is a userpage. Pegasus1138^{Talk | Contribs | Email} ---- 19:54, 15 May 2006 (UTC)

• Keep Come on, this is a userpage. The user shall edit his/her userpage as he/she pleases, as long as it does not offend anyone. --Osbus 21:59, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Userpages while technically for the most part in the user in question cannot be used to bypass our rules against just using them to spam information. See WP:USER. Pegasus1138^{Talk | Contribs | Email} ---- 23:33, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
    • I don't like the idea of deleting one's userpage...btw, have you requested that this user delete the info? There are no requests on the user's talk page, and deleting without requesting seems unfair. --Osbus 00:09, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
• Strong keep, unless you can provide specific quotes/evidence that this page is a "blatant advertisement." We should be less stringent about userpages in general, since they are not encyclopedic articles, claiming to state fact, unless the page is violating a Wikipedia policy. Find a policy it violates, and substantiate your claims. WikiPrez 00:47, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
• We tolerate some personal content on the user pages of good editors who are contributing to the encyclopedia. Looking at this user's contribution history, I see no positive contributions. As much as I'd like to assume good faith, this page does look like a pretty clear violation of our userpage policy. Wikipedia is not a free host, blog, or webspace provider. Delete. Rossami (talk) 04:37, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
• Strong delete per Rossami. --Sam Blanning^(talk) 11:12, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
• Strong Delete, I live in India, and this is completely an India-related propoganda which is being done on this userpage. WP:NOT a soapbox. --Andy123 talk 12:16, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Rossami. Text appears to be propaganda which the user posted to a completely unrelated page as his/her first edit. Here is where it was implicitly userfied. Since the text is highly questionable, and the user has shown no symptom in 3 months to do anything with it or participate in the encyclopedia, let's get rid of it. Martinp 16:14, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Rossami. Userspace freedom is extended as courtesy to good-faith constructive contributions. Courtesies are neither expected nor appropriate in situations where they are abused. Xoloz 18:53, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as propaganda —Mets501^talk 21:50, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy delete, spam, probably copyvio. ed g2s • talk 14:52, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, user made no contributions to Wikipedia except make this userpage and vandalize. Angr (t • c) 15:06, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:WWIN. Stifle (talk) 18:26, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:NOT given that the user's only contributions are vandalism. --Hughcharlesparker 15:30, 22 May 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.