Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:MiddleEastern/United States
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was speedy deleted as a contribution by a sockpuppet of a banned user. Kafziel Talk 18:08, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] User:MiddleEastern/United States
- Delete it's essentially a copy and paste of the United States article with the purpose of getting "IRRITATED PEOPLE TO LET IT ALL OUT". Violation of WP:NOT a soapbox.--Jersey Devil 08:08, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:NOT, essentially an attack page fork for the United States article. Rockpocket 08:11, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
- Keep loosen up guys! This is in a users own page space so WP:NOT does not apply here. ابو علي (Abu Ali) 08:58, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
- Indeed it does; in particular, Wikipedia is not a personal website provider, nor a discussion board. Delete as trolling. - Mike Rosoft 09:03, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
- KEEP - it's to protect the standard page, US article doesnt even link there, its for people who are angry to protect the encyclopedia. stop quoting rules you don't stick to yourselves... --MiddleEastern
- by the way, I am only referred to as a troll because a jewish admin says so..
- If it's not linked from the main United States article, how is it supposed to protect it? This is not to say that it should be linked from the main article; instead, it should be deleted because it encourages trolling. (By the way, I didn't personally call you a troll; now I may have a reason to. Exactly how is my religion or nationality relevant here? If you need to know, I am Czech and an atheist.) And what rules do I quote and don't follow? - Mike Rosoft 14:29, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete highly biased userpage that violates any number of policies, as already stated. Gwernol 14:49, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete: This page violates a number of policies, for example WP:NOT. --Meno25 14:50, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. We don't userfy a copy of every article that gets vandalized. Kafziel Talk 15:13, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - Um, no. That opens the door for many issues. What about a google search and a misdirected individual clicks on the wrong united states article from wikipedia and is shocked and confused? -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 15:30, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Plainly obvious the intent is for them to vandalise it, not anyone else. [1] Bubba hotep 15:53, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - Wikipedia is neither a blog nor free webspace. -- Avi 17:57, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
- Note: User:MiddleEastern has been banned as a sockpuppet of user:Frogsprog. -- Avi 18:01, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
- Comment yeah, I'd speedy delete and close this page right now because of that but since I am the nominator I might as well wait for another admin to do so.--Jersey Devil 18:05, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
