Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Lucacolla

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete without prejudice for creating a new userpage relating to work on the project. — xaosflux ^Talk 05:10, 24 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] User:Lucacolla

Thanks to User:DumbBOT for noticing this. For one thing, it's had two dated-prod tags on it for several two months, referring to nonexistent dates. The user concerned has no contribs except to this page, which were over two months ago now, and so seems to have left the project. Also, I can't figure out what this is about (parts aren't in English), nor what the prod reasons are meant to mean. I've notified Lucacolla on the talk page, but suspect that they have probably left the project. --ais523 14:33, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

Delete per nom. The page is mostly in Italian, and the guy is talking nonsense ("What I am writing is my smart attempt to destroy Wikipedia..") -- Sergio Ballestrero 19:00, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

• Keep (I have edited). I can't make head or tail of it, but we should not wantonly delete user pages and nothing there seems contrary to any policy or particularly objectionable. There was a malformed dated prod, which I refactored as a diary entry for the probable date meant, to avoid confusion. Since the prod reason made no sense, I thought it better not to treat it at face value. If user comes back, great. If not, I've just wasted 3 minutes. Martinp 23:46, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Wikipedia is not a web space provider (Liberatore, 2006). 11:57, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Userpages are not blogs/webspace providers -^demon^{[yell at me]} 13:45, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Appears to have been some sort of test account. We've hosted this guy's babblings long enough; since he doesn't appear to have made any edits outside of this page, and since he hasn't returned, there's no need to keep a test page.--Firsfron of Ronchester 00:24, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.