Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:LDBlackmore
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Not deleted. As a contributing editor we should WP:AGF on this one, however after keeping I'm taking GFDL liberty at and "stubbing" this page. This user has been inactive for 60 days, if they return they can rewrite their userpage as they would like, I'm going to leave them a link to the userpage policy as well. — xaosflux Talk 02:54, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] User:LDBlackmore
Seems only to be a vanity page. Originally the user had repeated posted the text as an article. When finally moved to his userpage, the user's only contributions has been for the most part to this page. My vote is neutral. -WarthogDemon 04:36, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, as it is a vanity page; also, does not accurately stress why the person is important. ("acknowledged expert" =)) -Slash-μιλώ 01:21, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
- Our policy on vanity pages doesn't normally apply to the userpages of users in good standing. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#Where "vanity" is allowed. -- Visviva 16:35, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
- Keep, user has made contributions outside of userspace, and this does not violate any aspect of WP:USER that I can see. -- Visviva 16:33, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
- Keep per Visviva. --Metropolitan90 20:30, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
- Keep user has made edits outside of the userpage and is an editor in good standing. ST47Talk 19:51, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per possible WP:COI violation. Yuser31415 03:42, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
- Keep acceptable as a userpage. I'm not sure what COI refers to here though, userpages are supposed to be written by their subjects. That this was originally moved from the article space is relevant but not decisive. Eluchil404 14:07, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.