Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Kinjili

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete Spam. El_C 08:17, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] User:Kinjili

1. User talk:Kinjili pure spam/advertisement/ultimate failure of WP:USER/WP:NOT
2. User:Jayjay94127 " "
3. User:Huvafenfushi " "
4. User:Gonomad " "
5. User:Ardatt " "
6. User:Bearingsmanufacturer " "
7. User_talk:Bearingsmanufacturer " "
8. User:Powermatic " "
9. User:MilanMalaysia " "
10. User:Leadership " "

All user pages are advertisements of users whom only contribs involve editing their spam or adding their spam to articles/talk page. Users are also inactive (as they seem to have only registered to spam/promote themselves). So as they are completely useless to the project in anyway and violation of WP:NOT/WP:USER, I believe they should be deleted.--Andeh 17:21, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

• Delete all. Impressively (and yet unsurprisingly), none of these users has made any contributions outside of their areas of interest. I have nowiki'ed the worst offenders weblinks. -- nae'blis 17:25, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as per nom. --Oblivious 20:48, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - blatant spam. MER-C 12:34, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.