Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Kelly Martin/B (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Speedy deleted. This and another similar page are relics of an ancient dispute serving no current purpose, and I am advised that the creator has no objection to deletion. Newyorkbrad 21:40, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] User:Kelly Martin/B

This page was previously deleted at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Kelly Martin/B in July 2006. Kelly Martin then created the current version. According to administrator Vassyana, it's not a repost of deleted material, i.e. the content is different. That takes us to the substantive question, viz., whether the existence of this page is helpful, hurtful, or neutral to the Wikipedia community. I think it's hurtful, based on A.Z.'s comment at Kelly Martin's current RFA. Shalom (Hello • Peace) 17:52, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

• Delete unnecessary user subpage which mentions a website that is despised here by countless people. Acalamari 20:16, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
• Comment. One sentence? Propose we speedy close this MFD as a waste of time. --AnonEMouse ^(squeak) 20:20, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete serves no useful purpose. Carlossuarez46 20:32, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
• Keep <Misza13> zOMGDrama. </Misza13> CO₂ 21:08, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
• Delete this mfd as being a waste of time. Seriously, find something better to do. -- John Reaves 21:12, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Maybe I should MfD this MfD... CO₂ 21:14, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.