Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Keithgreer/mrducky
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Keep per unanimous consensus. Xoloz 21:37, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] User:Keithgreer/mrducky
Nonsense, using Wikipedia as a free webhost for nonsense. Cyde Weys 06:50, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
- Very weak keep, it's harmless. Stifle (talk) 15:54, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
- Strong keep Editor in question has been here since June 2005, and has contributed constructively. I believe he deserves the courtesy of having his adorable "pet" in his userspace. This is the sort of gentle good humor that the most productive professional environments readily allow. If I chose to post a picture of my pet, I would certainly be depressed if it were nominated for deletion. :) Xoloz 16:41, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
- Keep, harmless humor of constructive contributor. Kusma (討論) 17:02, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
- Keep as per Xoloz and Kusma. --TantalumTelluride♪ 19:53, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
- Keep Drive space is cheap, and Keithgreer does a good job. ~Kylu (u|t) 04:08, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
Delete, I do not see how his pet his helping the encyclopedia. --Andy123 talk 12:33, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
- Keep, nothing in userspace helps the encyclopedia, why pick on this page? Angr (t • c) 15:07, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
- Keep. If we get rid of this, why not get rid of WP:BJADON too? ;) --Quadraxis 00:24, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
- Strong Keep Harmless fun Duke toaster 19:24, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
