Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:KJVTRUTH

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was closed as an inappropriate pursuit of a content dispute. See discussion on WP:AN/I --Tony Sidaway|Talk 04:24, 27 January 2006 (UTC)

Later: Discussion was on WP:AN. --Tony Sidaway|Talk 20:53, 29 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] user:KJVTRUTH

This page should be deleted because it presents unsupported information contrary to an official Wikipedia article as fact, when it is in fact contradicted by its "sources", i.e., 'Clinton was a Mason because he was in a Masonic youth group' (not the same), and 'Skull and Bones is a Masonic organization' (not true). KJVTRUTH's user page is a soapbox for his agenda, rather than being used in a manner appropriate to a WP user page, and thus contradicts the policy regarding userpages. MSJapan 03:40, 25 January 2006 (UTC)

• Keep. User pages are not subject to the same rules as articlespace.--SarekOfVulcan 17:47, 25 January 2006 (UTC)

Actually, yeah, they are. but besides that, it also violates User_page#What can I have on my user page? & User_page#What should I avoid?. Grye 18:10, 25 January 2006 (UTC)

• Delete Grye 18:10, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Wikipedia is NOT a web-hosting service. Physchim62 (talk) 18:50, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
• Keep "Another use is to let people know about your activities and opinions on Wikipedia. So you might include current plans, a journal of recent activities on Wikipedia, and your opinions on how certain Wikipedia articles or policies should be changed." It is not clear to me that there is any basis for listing this guy's user page for deletion. Tom Harrison ^Talk 18:59, 25 January 2006 (UTC)

Comment: I'd call it a POV fork more than anything else. The material he lists is what he feels should be added to List of Freemasons because it makes the Masons look bad, when many of the additions are not supported in any legitimate sources, and are often in fact wrong. He also never states an opinion on changes, none of the material would be allowed in the article for citation reasons, and says nothing about himself or his plans. MSJapan 21:28, 25 January 2006 (UTC)

It would be a POV fork if it were in the article space. On his user page it's just his "opinions on how certain Wikipedia articles or policies should be changed." Tom Harrison ^Talk 21:46, 25 January 2006 (UTC)

Comment some of it actually belongs on List of Freemasons, but it was removed as a byproduct of reverting other changes he made. At least some of the US VPs are WP:V.--SarekOfVulcan 03:32, 26 January 2006 (UTC)

• Delete User pages are not to be used as propaganda machines. --TML1988 21:37, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, user pages are not for web hosting. This is not helpful to building an encyclopedia.-gadfium 22:04, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
• Keep Agree with Tom harrison. This looks like a content dispute. Secretlondon 23:16, 25 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, blatant POV-pushing. WP:NOT a webhost. Radiant_>|< 01:26, 26 January 2006 (UTC)
• Keep Per Tommy boy. Arkon 05:59, 26 January 2006 (UTC)