Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:HyperBandGeeks

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete, expanding to include other suggested related pages also. Xoloz 16:01, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] User:HyperBandGeeks

This is a page full of one or more people blogging/chatting/posting images. User has no other edits. Daniel Olsen 00:00, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

• Delete; per nom, you beat me to it.--Andeh 00:27, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete I'm curious, how do you stumble over such editing islands? Derex 00:49, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
  • RC patrollers never sleep. Ever. --Daniel Olsen 03:22, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete cuz yno dis is like the dumbest page eva. (How'd I do?) Opabinia regalis 02:44, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete cuz I think itz stil a gud idea to no how to spel. Badbilltucker 18:15, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom and WP:NOT. Liek, totaly. --Brad Beattie ^(talk) 18:00, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. I would also recommend adding User:TROHLpage to this nomination, as it seems to be just a copy User:HyperBandGeeks. --TheParanoidOne 05:34, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
• Holy FSM, Nuke this nonsense Danny Lilithborne 02:35, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
• Comment There seems to be a part 2 to this, User:TROHLpage. There's also images that this user has made that are there.. and... my eyes.. can we just speedy all of this? please? Per WP:SNOWBALL, maybe? -- Ned Scott 04:25, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.