Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Hello2112/Glitch City

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete all. Daniel 02:00, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] User:Hello2112/Glitch City

User:Hello2112/Glitch City (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
User:Hello2112/Mew glitch (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
User:Hello2112/'M (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
User:Hello2112/Missingno. (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
User:Hello2112/other glitch Pokémon (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

A violation of several Wiki policies. These pages have not been edited for well over a year; WP:UP permits subpages for works-in-progress, but these are clearly not being worked on. Top of the page also says "Pokémon Archives personal project"; WP:NOT#WEBSPACE. Source is not given, but if it's from Wikipedia it's a GFDL violation as the user Hello2112 did not write all of the text, and authorship was finally deleted at Pokémon video game glitches. This also means that these can never be worked on and later transferred to the mainspace since there is consensus not to have these articles there. The other four pages claim is from Bulbapedia, which is again a copyright problem since Bulbapedia is licensed Creative Commons and we are GFDL, and the two don't mix and match. hbdragon88 (talk) 06:01, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete all, per nom - ∅ (∅), 22:23, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete While GFDL-compliance could be achieved here if the articles were edited to demonstrate merit that warranted history restorations, the failure of the user to make any argument here (and he has edited since the discussion began, so presumably receiving the notice that was given) suggests that he has abandoned them. Xoloz (talk) 13:51, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.