Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:God of War/POV Box

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep It's an early close, granted, but I think there's a strong enough consensus after 4 days, with not a single delete vote registered. Hiding talk 14:04, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] User:God of War/POV Box

"Template" does nothing to assist the encyclopedia. Also violates the WP:NPOV and WP:POINT policy amoung others. Usage wise, its only being utilized in one POV userspace article, and doesn't link to anything else. Clear violation of the usage for template/user space. -Zero^Talk 16:46, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

• Speedy keep, as user subpages have been used for transclusion to simplify the code of the main page for a long time. The page it is used in - User:God of War/Tyranny and Fascism - Past and Present - just survived MFD. --SPUI (talk - don't use sorted stub templates!) 16:48, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

Indeed. And could you kindly explain the purpose of these userspace documents....? -Zero^Talk

NPOV does not apply to userspace -- editors are not required to be robots. This marker makes that clear to anyone who might be confused. Such clarity is obviously good, as you, Zero, do appear confused on this point. Making a marker to highlight existing policy cannot be a WP:POINT violation, either. Xoloz 17:22, 11 March 2006 (UTC)

• Not sure if this is the appropriate place for this nomination. In any event, this offends nothing. Strong Keep. Xoloz 16:59, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep NPOV does not apply, this is not an article. The POV Box is not disrupting Wikipedia, so this does not violate POINT. I don't see any need to delete this. Pagrashtak 01:00, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep NPOV should not apply outside article space AdamJacobMuller 02:54, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep --Moby 07:42, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per Pagrashtak. —Andux^␅ 02:07, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per above --Khoikhoi 04:12, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
• keep per above Mike McGregor (Can) 06:25, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Keep -- Nothing stated is a legitimate issue for a user page. --Mysidia (talk) 09:27, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep, but recommend subst'ing, as I don't think this template will feasibly be used outside of the one page. Quite appropriate for userspace. --Blu Aardvark | ^{(talk) | (contribs)} 22:30, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. Reasonalable for userspace.Herostratus 08:18, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.