Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Gimmeaclue

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Speedy Deleted per CSD U1. I will interpret the user's statement as a desire to remove the content from the page's history as well. If I am incorrect, the user may please so advise. Xoloz 17:08, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] User:Gimmeaclue

• Delete, fails the user page guidelines by a light year, appears to be primarily made to advertise.

Belongs to user Gimmeaclue (talk • contribs • page moves • block user • block log). --Andeh 14:54, 14 July 2006 (UTC)

• Keep. You can also use your user page to help to use Wikipedia more effectively: so you can use it to list "to do" information, work in progress, reminders, useful links, and so forth. It's also good for experimenting with markup (that is, as a personal sandbox). This looks like someone making a good-faith attempt to draft up an article about a website that might become notable soon. --M@rēino 18:29, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
  • The website has one employee and I got 1 g-hit to the website, so it's not notable anyway. I find it very hard to believe the user isn't actually the owner of gimmeaclue.--Andeh 19:35, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
    • Oh, I wouldn't be surprised if you're correct, but it's a rather neat website, and I'm in a good mood today....--M@rēino 21:19, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete: improper use of userpage as an advertisement. Even if it's being used as a sandbox for a potential page in the article namespace, that article would be non-notable and a vanity page. -- NORTH ^talk 21:35, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy delete The page's 'owner' has replaced the page with a message saying he agrees with the deletion, so it's a WP:CSD U1. --ais523 13:53, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy close with no action per rationale by Ais523. Since the user has deleted the page content, there is no need to do anything. Martinp 14:08, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
• Close, no action, per Martinp. No need to delete this from the page history, and no reason to take away the main user page (not a subpage) from Gimmeaclue. Barno 22:39, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.