Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Geo.plrd/audit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was I'm going to infer from the authors comment that csd will be applied. Defer this for now. Navou ^banter / _contribs 02:42, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

Edit conflict - speedy delete, per author's request. Titoxd^{(?!? - cool stuff)} 02:44, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] User:Geo.plrd/audit

Not seeing how this is going to help the project. However, the guiding principle here appears to be WP:NOT#BUREAUCRACY. However, if this is a serious proposal, it should probably be moved to the project namespace, its has seen no discussion as of this nomination. Navou ^banter / _contribs 00:15, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

Can this be speedied? Geo. Talk to me 01:04, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

• Depends, speedied which way? Navou ^banter / _contribs 01:07, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

• {{db-author}} Veesicle (Talk) (Contribs) 01:48, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

Yup, I just was not sure if that is what he/she wanted. Anyone can close the MFD if I don't, once he/she applies that tag as I believe the db-author would supersede and with no objections on my part. Navou ^banter / _contribs 02:08, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

• Well I think as Geo has asked for it here you could probably apply the tag yourself with a link to this page. But there's no rush I guess :) Veesicle (Talk) (Contribs) 02:14, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.