Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Flameviper/Hilarity

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. Xoloz 16:01, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] User:Flameviper/Hilarity

I'm not sure how this improves the project. Note; In the interest of disclosing any actual or perceived COI, I am on this page. Navou 03:23, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

• Keep, harmless silliness. A page of amusing, on-wiki quotes kept by an otherwise productive editor is no big deal. Night Gyr (talk/Oy) 05:05, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
• Comment Flameviper was banned in February, so I'm not sure if we want to be holding this for him. Metros 12:15, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
• neutral, didn't realize he was banned. Night Gyr (talk/Oy) 14:19, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - Unneeded subpage of a banned user. Clyde (a.k.a Mystytopia) 17:57, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
• Delete not really worth keeping. DGG 21:18, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per those who cite the banned user principle. YechielMan 04:38, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
• Delete This is a page of a banned user, has no value, and is off topic.--James, La gloria è a dio 01:07, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
• Delete in agreement with Sir james paul. Acalamari 16:52, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per YechielMan-—arf! 13:43, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. What the crap? Most stuff on it isn't even that funny. —Crazytales (public computer) ^{(talk) (main)} 19:37, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:DENY. John Vandenberg 09:12, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.