Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:EVula/Userboxes/Eris

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was speedily kept. ~ Riana ⁂ 11:31, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] User:EVula/Userboxes/Eris

Delete Nonsensical userbox. No person can be from Eris. This userbox makes no sense. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 07:59, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

• Speedy keep per our old consensus at WP:GUS. -- Ned Scott 08:09, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
• Speedy Keep its a userbox, it is not abusive in anyway. If people want to state the obvious it is their choice. "Nonsensical" is not a valid reason for deletion. Fosnez (talk) 09:08, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

So there is no encyclopedic value and seriousness in wikipedia? Wikipedia is not The National Enquirer. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 09:16, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

• Speedy Keep WP:GUS and the fact that Wikipedia most certainly doesn't take itself seriously 100% of the time, lighten up. Milonica (talk) 09:19, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
• Speedy Keep, pie nom. If the existence of WP:) wasn't any indication... -Jéské ^{(Blah v^_^v)} 09:45, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.