Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:E1foley
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Delete page and images. Xoloz 16:09, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
[edit] User:E1foley
Wikipedia is not a free hosting service. User has made no edits except to his user page and the images on it, and even then no edits since July. Delete. —Angr 17:26, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Delete the images too. -- Ned Scott 23:43, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
- Speaking of those images, one other page uses one, User:Evanlivingstone. Claims a different last name, but same idea. Long bio on user page, only one edit to an article, no activity since July. I think this page should be thrown in this MfD as well. -- Ned Scott 23:47, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
- I noticed that too. Evan Livingstone uploaded an image called Evan.jpg in July 2003, which got deleted. Three years later Evan Foley came along and uploaded a different image also called Evan.jpg, it being a pretty obvious name for someone called Evan. Since the image link was still on Livingstone's user page, Foley's pic is now showing up on Livingstone's page as well. User:Evanlivingstone is a pretty innocuous user page though -- clearly not an attempt to be a MySpace page -- so I feel no pressing urge to delete it. —Angr 09:48, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
- Speaking of those images, one other page uses one, User:Evanlivingstone. Claims a different last name, but same idea. Long bio on user page, only one edit to an article, no activity since July. I think this page should be thrown in this MfD as well. -- Ned Scott 23:47, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Badbilltucker 16:47, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom.--Húsönd 21:52, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
- Delete with all of the images, but keep the other page Most of what I want to say has been said above, but other than that, there is really no need to delete a small userpage. However, the closing admin may want to remove the image on User:Evanlivingstone once it is deleted. The ikiroid (talk·desk·Advise me) 23:16, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
