Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Dystopianray

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. Xoloz 14:38, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] User:Dystopianray

I'm not totally sure what this is, looks like a chatroom or roleplay of some sort, certainly not appropriate for Wikipedia, see WP:USERPAGE. I think it could be some sort of cyber sex chat. Andeh 13:12, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

Week keep, although it could be copyrighted. It's nonsense, but it's pretty harmless nonsense. The user does have some potentially constructive edits, so we could just steer them in the right direction and attempt to allow the user time to remove the content. EVOCATIVEINTRIGUE TALKTOME | EMAILME | IMPROVEME 16:48, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

Delete: WP:USER says Anything that is compatible with the Wikipedia project. is acceptable for a user page, so I now support deleting this page per nom. EVOCATIVEINTRIGUE TALKTOME | EMAILME | IMPROVEME 16:48, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

• Delete entirely inappropriate. Does nothing more than waste server space and bandwidth. Molerat 16:53, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Molerat. Kalani ^[talk|esp] 17:17, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
• Keep, Move to talk page. It's only using 11k of server space. If we all stopped debating whether to delete it, it wouldn't take up any bandwidth at all because no one would be reading it. It's not copyrighted -- if you look at the page history, it was clearly created over time by users talking to Dystopianray and Dystopianray replying. It's not much dumber than some of the things on my own talk page.--M@rēino 20:21, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

• Why keep it? It's got absolutely nothing to do with Wikipedia. Yes it may be small, but is totally inappropriate. Wikipedia isn't a chat room.--Andeh 10:26, 2 July 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per WP:NOT a free webhosting service. They can easily set up there own wiki if they want to do this kind of thing. arguments relating to server space are irrelavent as content stays on the server anyway Ydam 20:59, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Over the top I'm afraid. Herostratus 06:04, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Not the place. --Improv 15:26, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.