Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Dr jarf

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. As suggested, I won't delete the other Drjarf at this time. Xoloz 16:21, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] User:Dr jarf

There is no user of this name; page was created in a mistaken attempt by User:Greatgavini to userfy a vanity page. Hit bull, win steak^(Moo!) 19:43, 15 May 2006 (UTC)

• Delete, and I think we should delete User:Drjarf as well because it is spam. —Mets501^talk 21:52, 16 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete the redirect as an uncontroversial page-move error. The target is more difficult. While it was in the main article-space, it could have been speedy-deleted under case A7. It is an autobiographical vanity article with no assertion of notability. It is, furthermore, the user's only edit to date. Now that it's in the userspace, we can afford to give the user the benefit of doubt for a while. I note that the page was only created yesterday. I'd like to assume good faith that the user will return to the project and make positive contributions. Rossami (talk) 00:22, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete this redirect for sure. Wait a few weeks on User:Drjarf to see if he comes back and makes any useful contributions. Angr (t • c) 08:36, 19 May 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.