Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Djsatty

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was "Speedy Deletion criteria G11," Gnangarra 07:49, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] User:Djsatty

Prodded, deleted, reposted. Wikipedia is not myspace. I'd also like a blocking. MER-C 06:09, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

• Delete. This user has made no contributions outside his user page (Special:Contributions/Djsatty). The page itself is also a violation of WP:NOT. However, I don't agree with blocking - nobody has told him why what he's doing is wrong. He probably just thought his userpage vanished through some glitch. Leave a message on his talk page explaining WP:USER, and if he recreates this again, then he can and should be blocked. Srose (talk) 18:46, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete as recreation of deleted content. Jorcoga ^Hi!_{02:04, Sunday, January 28 2007}
  • Comment For future reference, recreated prods don't fall under the criteria for speedy deletion, since the recreation of a deleted prod is considered contesting the prod. --Coredesat 03:11, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
• Regular delete per nom's WP:NOT concern, no need to block. --Coredesat 03:11, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
• Tagged as {{db-repost}}. Yuser31415 (Editor review two!) 05:45, 30 January 2007 (UTC) As per Coredesat's post above, instead tagged as db-spam. Yuser31415 (Editor review two!) 05:52, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

note User has been advised of this decision and WP:NOT and WP:USER policies on the users talk page Gnangarra

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.