Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Davnel03/Vandals

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was speedy keep, nomination withdrawn. I apologize to Davnel03; I misunderstood the nature of the situation, which appears more serious than what I at first thought. Shalom (Hello • Peace) 02:06, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] User:Davnel03/Vandals

It's time to bury the hatchet, Davnel03. There's no purpose in keeping this log three months after the fact and linking to it from your main userpage. Shalom (Hello • Peace) 20:45, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

Please see [1] [2], which is still vandalism being aimed at me. By the way, the things in my vandal page, is so that I can keep an eye on any recurring vandalism coming from the same IP addresses. Thanks, Davnel03 20:50, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

In that case, update it... with the new ip's vandalizing your userspace. --Rocksanddirt 22:52, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

Done. And as I mentioned in my last comment, yes I have noticed that there is major recurring vandalism being aimed towards be. Maybe a block should be needed at the IP? Davnel03 15:33, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

• Keep - I don't see any grounds for deletion here. The nom didn't even list any reasons to delete it; he just commented on how he thinks Davnel should deal with his own problems. The Hybrid 02:13, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
• Qualified Keep Potentially this is a magnet for further vandalism but essentially there is nothing out of policy here as Davenel03 is a productive contributor and therefore entitled to wide lattitude on what he keeps in his user area. Spartaz ^Humbug! 05:59, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
• Keep productive editors are allowed to have stuff like this in userspace, no actual policy or guideline violation. Hut 8.5 18:44, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy keep per above. Shouldn't have been nominated. Rocket000 05:19, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.