Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Cloudsdriftby

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was no consensus. Greeves (talk • contribs) 01:14, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] User:Cloudsdriftby

Not an actual editor's page: Only edits (20, all in March and June) are to this user page and its 82 userboxes. WP is not a permanent free webhost/MySpace substitute. PROD tag added, but removed by User:Doug with the edit summary Not editing is not grounds for deletion of an otherwise OK userpage, which is not even close to being correct, as a quick glance at this, this, and this would have revealed.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Calton (talk • contribs) 15:10, 25 February 2008

  • Delete. This user is not a contributor to the encyclopedia, and none of this page's contents help to build an encyclopedia. Further, we have policy on this, as noted by the nominator. — Gavia immer (talk) 22:33, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep. The page violates no policy, and there's no reason to delete it simply because the user hasn't edited yet. --UsaSatsui (talk) 17:54, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
  • A quick glance at this, this, and this, as above, should have been a sufficient clue about the violated policies. Did you overlook them? --Calton | Talk 18:31, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete. User appears to have departed a long time ago without actually helping the encyclopedia. At best, there's no reason to keep a userpage for a user who is no longer around; at worst, Wikipedia is not MySpace. —Scott5114↗ [EXACT CHANGE ONLY] 19:37, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
  • See my comment above about this being pointless and possibly detrimental. There is no policy against having a page of userboxes but not editing.--Doug.(talk • contribs) 20:25, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Reality check: a quick glance at this, this, and this should have been a sufficient clue -- especially since I already left them on your User Talk page. Did you overlook them? --Calton | Talk 18:31, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
Your "response" is non-responsive and factually incorrect. --Calton | Talk 03:27, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.