The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Delete. Xoloz 15:13, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
Text of a deleted article (see here, here, and here), moved into user space in November 2005 and untouched since. The user has not edited at all since March 2006. Since this is, in effect, an unimproved and (imo) unimprovable deleted article regarding a non-existent organization, it needs to go. Calton | Talk 02:37, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
Delete per very complete nom. Yomanganitalk 09:33, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
Delete per Calton's well written nomination statement. Thryduulf 13:05, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.