Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Cbadhistory

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 09:17, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] User:Cbadhistory

WP:NOT says that wikipedia is not a webspace provider. This person is using his user page as a webspace to advertise Carlsbad Historical Society. James, La gloria è a dio 03:01, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

• Delete Violation of WP:NOT.--James, La gloria è a dio 03:01, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
• Just blank it and leave the person a note. I don't think it should be deleted unless the user name itself is objectionable. Wait a sec . . . OK, it's taken care of. --Butseriouslyfolks 04:28, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
• Keep, not a problem. -N 10:37, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Users are individuals, not organizations, and user pages ain't for advertising to begin with. --Calton | Talk 15:45, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. There is absolutely no reason to keep the page (it doesn't even have incoming links). There is, however, a compelling reason to delete it: i.e., the deletion of the revision history, which includes a copyvio version. -- Black Falcon ^(Talk) 21:04, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
• Delete ah, now there's a reason I can get behind. Delete, copyvio. -N 21:25, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per all the above reasons. Doesn't Wikipedia forbid several individuals from sharing the same account anyway? Bi 06:06, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.