Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Blaqdavinci

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep and discuss guidelines with user. —Doug Bell ^talk 06:47, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] User:Blaqdavinci

Wikipedia is not personal webspace per WP:NOT#WEBSPACE Atomic1609 18:00, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

• Delete recommend you let the user know that the debate is taking place. ST47Talk 19:44, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
• Keep This was just created by a new user. Users generally talk about themselves a little. If you could explain to the user what you find objectionable about the page (such as that it should discuss WP interests more and his musical talents less), that might be a better solution. JChap2007 20:04, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
• Keep Other than the third-person and encylopedic tone, it's no different to thousands of other user pages. Discuss with the user would be more appropriate. CiaranG 21:34, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
• Keep. I also think that discussion with the user is more appropriate. –Llama man 00:05, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
• Keep at this time per JChap. Yuser31415 (Editor review two!) 00:12, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
• Keep for the time being. If the user continues to remain inactibve, feel free to come back in a month's or so's time. MER-C 12:16, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
• Keep. Users are allowed to put own biography on their userpage. Personally, I think a better solution to this would be conversing with the user to explain him what can and what cannot be put on a userpage instead of biting a newly registered user. I disagree with MER-C that userpages should be deleted on the basis of inactiveness, as we should never judge a userpage by the user himself. Michaelas10 (Talk) 13:02, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Per Wikipedia is not a social site.Tellyaddict^{Editor review!} 16:51, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
• Weak Delete per Atomic1609. this is a direct violation of WP:NOT#WEBSPACE, and User:Blaqdavinci should know userpages dont show up in at least the first 50 google results.DUBJAY04 01:41, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
• Keep − Oh! You biters! − Twas Now ( talk • contribs • e-mail ) 05:48, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
• Keep - A MfD for a newcomer's userpage? No, I cannot agree ;-). Twas Now has pointed at WP:BITE and I must do the same. He just started here and we shouldn't file a MfD without even trying to discuss with him. Surely his userpage is far from perfect ;-) and, as JChap2007 said, he should talk more about wikipedia-related things, but well, why bite him? ;-) By the way, this nomination is of 2007-02-06 18:00 and the first revision of Blaqdavinci's page is of 2007-02-06 18:32... How can such a thing happen? Anyway, Happy Editing by Snowolf^(talk) on 22:21, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

Well, I've checked the history of this page and its first revision is of 18:58, so I guess the problem is with the local time ;-) Happy Editing by Snowolf^(talk) on 22:23, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

• Keep Sould be ceaned up in order to better meet WP:USER--Hu12 04:58, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
• Keep Yeah. Way way too new of a user to delete his userpage. I think that the user just needed some gentle guidance, that's all. --Woohookitty^Woohoo! 08:17, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
• Keep- that's your average newbie's page. Jorcoga ^(Hi!/Review)23:58, Saturday, 10 February '07
• Note This appears to have been an attempt at a vanity article, and was moved to this user's page and possibly not an attempt to share their info as an editor. — xaosflux ^Talk 00:22, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.