Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:BlakeCS/0xFACADE

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. >Radiant< 12:29, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] User:BlakeCS/0xFACADE

This user had created these articles as regular Wikipedia articles, but then stopped after I had removed them and redirected them all to Magic number (programming). I am proposing this all per WP:NOT. :: Colin Keigher (Talk) 23:23, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

This nomination also includes...

User:BlakeCS/0xA5A5A5A5, User:BlakeCS/0xABABABAB, User:BlakeCS/0xABADBABE, User:BlakeCS/0xABADCAFE, User:BlakeCS/0xBAADF00D, User:BlakeCS/0xBABEF00D, User:BlakeCS/0xBADCAB1E, User:BlakeCS/0xBEEFCACE, User:BlakeCS/0xC0DEDBAD, User:BlakeCS/0xCAFEBEEF, User:BlakeCS/0xCAFEFEED, User:BlakeCS/0xCCCCCCCC, User:BlakeCS/0xCDCDCDCD, User:BlakeCS/0xCEFAEDFE, User:BlakeCS/0xDDDDDDDD, User:BlakeCS/0xDEADBABE, User:BlakeCS/0xDEADBEEF, User:BlakeCS/0xDEADDEAD, User:BlakeCS/0xDEADF00D, User:BlakeCS/0xDECAFBAD, User:BlakeCS/0xEBEBEBEB, User:BlakeCS/0xFACEBEEF, User:BlakeCS/0xFADEDEAD, User:BlakeCS/0xFADEFACE, User:BlakeCS/0xFDFDFDFD, User:BlakeCS/0xFEE1DEAD, User:BlakeCS/0xFEEDFACE, User:BlakeCS/0xFEEEFEEE, User:BlakeCS/0xBADC0FFEE, User:BlakeCS/0xBADBADBADBAD, User:BlakeCS/0xDEADBEEFCAFE, User:BlakeCS/0xDEADCAFEBABE, User:BlakeCS/0xFEEDBABEF00D, User:BlakeCS/0xFEEDFACEC0FFEE, User:BlakeCS/0xBADC0FFEE0DDF00D, User:BlakeCS/0xC0CAC01AADD511FE, User:BlakeCS/0xCAFEBEEFCAFEBEEF, and User:BlakeCS/0xFACEBEEFFACEBEEF

• Delete all. You don't avoid editorial decisions by making userspace articles. -Amarkov ^blah_edits 16:15, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete all Happened to notice because all these pages are turning up in the uncategorized articles backlog. Such pages have been routinely merged to the magic number article and having them in user space is just creating confusion. Pascal.Tesson 23:47, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete they forgot 0xB00B1E5 and 0xA55FACE. --Infrangible 03:38, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete all including any missed. --Fang Aili ^talk 15:16, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.