Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Asteraki/Pascha

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Have modified User:Asteraki/ALEXANDER THE GREAT to exclude copyvio text. ~ Riana ⁂ 13:44, 28 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] User:Asteraki/Pascha

Also:

Group nomination. Several user subpages containing a mix of political propaganda/soapboxing and uselessly userfied deleted article material (partly from de-wiki) kept around for political purposes and not used for any constructive ongoing work. Inappropriate use of user space, per WP:USER (userspace is not for extensive political statements unrelated to Wikipedia). Fut.Perf. ☼ 17:03, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

  • Keep Looks like a well designed userpage with references to various historical figures. I can't see any good reason to delete it. --RucasHost 19:13, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
    • Excuse me, but which of the five pages above are you talking about? Fut.Perf. ☼ 19:37, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
      • When I was a kid there was a teaching game adults played with kids -- "which of these things is not like the others". Sorry, but, IMO, you nominated pages that were insufficiently similar to be grouped together. Geo Swan 13:27, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Strong delete all per WP:SOAP and WP:NOT#BLOG, blatant soapboxing. - ∅ (∅), 22:37, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
    • Extending my !vote to User:Asteraki/Asteraki, delete all six pages. Wikipedia is not a soap box - ∅ (∅), 08:09, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete all per above. Also User:Asteraki/Asteraki. MER-C 09:05, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete all per User:I do not exist (WP:SOAP/WP:NOT).  hmwith  talk 21:42, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep -- Sorry, this nomination hasn't really made a case for deletion of this material.
    • I don't see anything remotely questionable about User:Asteraki/ALEXANDER THE GREAT. So, what am I missing?
    • I don't remember ever actually reading WP:USER before. So, I took a brief look at it. I did a text search for "politic". Nada. Could the nominator please be more specific in explaining how the other pages fail to comply with WP:USER?
    • Some pages are in a foreign language. If this is counter to policy could the nominator cite the specific policy?
    • Cheers! Geo Swan 13:27, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
      • Comment: The relevant part of WP:USER is: "What can I not have on my user page? [...] Extensive personal opinions on matters unrelated to Wikipedia [...] this space is not intended to indefinitely archive your preferred version of disputed or previously deleted content". The German passages are deleted articles from de-wiki. Fut.Perf. ☼ 15:07, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
        • Okay. I will agree about the deleted articles from de. -- but what were your objections to User:Asteraki/ALEXANDER THE GREAT? And why did you lump it in with the others? Cheers! Geo Swan 17:08, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
          • Actually, now that I look at it again... I originally thought it was a great big heap of "opinions unrelated to Wikipedia", namely about Alexander the Great. I only now realise it's a copyvio of a song text. So, scrap the song text; that leaves just a heap of silly patriotic image-waving. Let him keep that if he must. Fut.Perf. ☼ 17:13, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.