Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Apehawk

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was . — xaosflux ^Talk 07:33, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] User:Apehawk

Not an active editor's page: Has 50 edits total, all but 3 of them to this page. Two non-user edits -- both from May -- added and removed nonsense to Keira Knightley. Last edits in November -- except for the the two edits a few days ago to remove the PROD tag and blank his user page. WP is not a permanent free webhost/MySpace substitute. Calton | Talk 05:02, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. He has even blanked his talk page of warnings. His userpage is completely uncyclopedic. A list of his owned XBox games? Gaming career? Total MySpacing. See his external links. --♥Tohru Honda13♥^Talk 19:10, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete wow, Tohru...you hit the nail on the head ;). WP:NOT. Arjun 21:38, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
• Quick Delete Its a violation of WP:NOT and our user page guidlines. --James, La gloria è a dio 00:22, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
• Wikipedia is not a blog, webspace provider, or social networking site Wikipedia is not MySpace. You may not host your own website, blog, or wiki at Wikipedia. Wikipedia pages are not, Personal web pages. Wikipedians have their own user pages, but they may be used only to present information relevant to working on the encyclopedia. If you are looking to make a personal webpage or blog, please make use of one of the many free providers on the Internet. The focus of user pages should not be social networking, but rather providing a foundation for effective collaboration.

This is to me, what area of wikipedia:not it is violating. --James, La gloria è a dio 00:50, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

• Delete - per above --T-rex 16:43, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete I'll reluctantly agree with WP:NOT, but what are userboxes? They tell what people like/dislike, own/don't own, do/don't do, eat/don't eat, drink/don't drink and various other things. Why can't this user have his userpage? --  Mikedk9109  (hit me up) ^SIGN 18:17, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete- Goes against userpage guidelines, and per above--SUIT⁴² 19:39, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
• can't we make these speedy deleteable? ~Crazytales (IP locations!) 03:03, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, violation of the usage of userpages. Terence Ong 11:57, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.