Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Andries/Sathya Sai Baba

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete ~ Riana ⁂ 04:24, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] User:Andries/Sathya_Sai_Baba

User:Andries/Sathya_Sai_Baba (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

User:Andries/Sathya_Sai_Baba_movement (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

User is topic banned. See Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Sathya_Sai_Baba_2#Andries_banned ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 04:06, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

note that these sandbox pages were created before the topic ban. Nonetheless, I think that these should be deleted anyway, as they may be considered a ban violation if kept. ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 17:12, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. There is no point in allowing a user to "sandbox" on an article he is forbidden to edit. Shalom ^Hello 13:37, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. There is no reason to let a user make sandbox pages related to a topic from which he is banned. Bart133 ^{(t) (c)} 16:03, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - per nom Onnaghar ^{tl | co | @} 13:09, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. SilkTork 21:24, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete users should not be able to make a sandbox about an article they are banned from. Oysterguitarist 03:15, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.