Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Aaronshavit/Zionism and racism allegations

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Keep. Xoloz 06:39, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] User:Aaronshavit/Zionism and racism allegations

clear userspace violation as per WP:USER#Copies_of_other_pages. Which states "Private copies of pages that are being used solely for long-term archival purposes may be subject to deletion." Sefringle^Talk 01:37, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

• Speedy Keep. This one has been active more recently that the other page nominated, having been edited less than a day ago. This is marked as a draft on the user's main page and should be treated as such. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 03:32, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

• Keep - page created earlier this month and being edited. Addhoc 09:45, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

• Keep. From the same section you linked to: While userpages and subpages can be used as a development ground for generating new content, [...] Melsaran (talk) 11:58, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

• Move to main space. This is in fine shape to be moved to main space where others can contribute to it as well. — Carl (CBM · talk) 18:14, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
• Most definitely do not move to main space. A laundry list of mostly unsourced assertions and allegations is no basis for an article, reads more like a personal essay than anything else, and falls foul of WP:SYNTH and arguably WP:POV. >Radiant< 11:52, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

• Certainly Keep -- this is clearly a work-in-progress, to which a number of editors have contributed, and which is still being developed. As such, it seems a perfectly appropriate use of name space. Radiant comments that it is "mostly unsourced assertions and allegations"; as Aaronshavit states on his User Page, this is a draft, and we are trying to improve it so that it can become an article. It's not yet ready to move to name space, and no other articles yet link to it. It would not be appropriate to delete this while it is in its current location and still being worked on. RolandR 21:29, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.