Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Template:User Badminton

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. Greeves ^{(talk • contribs)} 00:11, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Template:User Badminton

Template duplicate with User:UBX/badminton Aleenf1 07:55, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

• Speedy close as wrong venue. Should be in WP:TfD. Redfarmer (talk) 14:00, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

• See Wikipedia:Templates for deletion/Log/2008 March 13#Template:User Badminton. Black Falcon ^(Talk) 17:03, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
• Venue is proper, all userboxes come here regardless of namespace as a result of a discussion at WT:TFD some months back and the tops of both XfDs so state. There's another one listed on March 12, below.--Doug.^{(talk • contribs)} 18:48, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
  • In fact, I just speedy closed this at TFD yesterday as wrong forum.--Doug.^{(talk • contribs)} 18:50, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

• Keep Its not a duplicate. CWii_{(Talk|Contribs)} 01:55, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
• Although, I closed this as at TFD, it was entirely procedural and I will not be closing it here so I will take a position: Userfy - it's one of those personal "I like x" types that needs to be in userspace. It can go right beside the other one as User:UBX/Badminton2, it doesn't matter that there are two of them, people can take their pick. If someday we find that one of them is an orphan we can delete it then.--Doug.^{(talk • contribs)} 03:58, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
• Keep everything that's nominated for MfD. Obuibo Mbstpo (talk) 17:57, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Huh? Is that just a pointy !vote, or what?--Doug.^{(talk • contribs)} 20:38, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
• Keep per Mbstpo, not as a rigid principle, but as to every MfD I've seen so far -- I'm working down a list that appeared on AN/I complaining about his !votes -- they are a waste of time, busybodiness, stuff doing no harm, either useful to someone, possibly useful, or at worst harmless. The effort to consider deletion is far more valuable than the damage, if any, done by leaving it. PROD it. If someone -- anyone -- wants to keep it, keep it. Don't waste the community's time debating nothing of value.--Abd (talk) 22:05, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
  • I know you know this by now Abd, but in case there are newbies out there watching - you can't Prod a template, you can't Prod something that's been discussed at MfD before or something that's been Prodded before, you can always take any Prod to the appropriate XfD for discussion, and the very idea that something should be kept because it should've been Prodded is nonsensical.--Doug.^{(talk • contribs)} 04:48, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.