Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Talk:Vanguard: Saga of Heroes/beta

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. >Radiant< 14:25, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Talk:Vanguard: Saga of Heroes/beta

I noticed this link at the bottom of Vanguard: Saga of Heroes. Wikipedia isn't a review site, and I don't think this belongs here. GeeJo ^(t)⁄_(c) • 15:39, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

• delete per WP:NOT also I don't believe anything but an archive should be trailing a talk page but could not find the reference. Jeepday 03:40, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
• move to userspace - it would be less offensive to the writer if the page is moved to the userspace instead of deleted without trace (similar to the case of newcomers writing vanity). However, at any rate, this page is not to be kept here, per Jeepday and GeeJo. --Deryck C. 12:40, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. No encyclopedic information, it's all the author's opinions and editorializing. There's nothing here that can be referenced or cited for inclusion. Make sure that the author has be notified so that they can copy the text onto their own computer if they so desire. A Train ^{take the} 20:21, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete − Yeeeesh! − Twas Now ( talk • contribs • e-mail ) 01:03, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
• Can this be transwikied somewhere? Titoxd^(?!?) 05:21, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Wikipedia is not the place for reviews of video games, especially in the "Talk" namespace. –Llama man 00:51, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.