Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Talk:13256278887989457651018865901401704640

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was withdrawn, taken to RfD. One 00:34, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Talk:13256278887989457651018865901401704640

I marked this as a speedy deletion as nonsense but it was undeleted as an invalid g8. Inclusion of meaningless redirects like the one proposed here are WP:KEYSPAM. This is an implausible term in the search box. -N 22:35, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

• Also co-nominating the regular page due to unprotection and creation of redirect. -N 22:42, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, just delete it already... :) *Cremepuff222* 22:37, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

• Comment I've made the page into a protected redirect to the main article on the subject. Can we get back to actually important stuff now and close this discussion? JoshuaZ 22:40, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
  • This is nonsense and doesn't need to be on Wikipedia. MfD is possibly not the correct forum but if necessary I will move it to the correct forum. -N 22:42, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

• Close discussion. Why is this on MfD anyway? Redirects have their own discussion process. --tjstrf talk 22:43, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
  • It's on MfD because it was originally the talk page of a protected title. I created the MfD while the page was undeleted (before it became a redirect). -N 22:50, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
• Withdraw nom I'll take it to rfd. -N 22:50, 22 May 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.