Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Naruto

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. — xaosflux ^Talk 03:59, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Portal:Naruto

Portal has not had any real updating in over a year and it doesn't look like it was ever really finished at all. It focuses on Naruto a single manga and anime series. The topic has seen a growing reduction in articles over the last year during its clean up, with more on their way out, it does not seem to be a valid portal any longer nor a necessary one.Collectonian (talk) 23:59, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

As noted below, I'm also including the following pages in this MfD, which are all subpages of this portal:

• Portal:Naruto/FAQ
• Portal:Naruto/Categories
• Portal:Naruto/Collaborations
• Portal:Naruto/Did you know
• Portal:Naruto/FAQ
• Portal:Naruto/Intro
• Portal:Naruto/Lists
• Portal:Naruto/Naruto news
• Portal:Naruto/Naruto topics
• Portal:Naruto/Next Episode
• Portal:Naruto/Related Portals
• Portal:Naruto/Selected article
• Portal:Naruto/Selected character
• Portal:Naruto/Things you can do
• Portal:Naruto/WikiProjects
• Portal:Naruto/box-footer
• Portal:Naruto/box-header
• Portal:Naruto/box-header-left
• Portal:Naruto/box-header-middle
• Portal:Naruto/box-header-right
• Portal:Naruto/box-header-top

Collectonian (talk) 14:53, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. John Carter (talk) 00:02, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. -- Collectonian (talk) 00:02, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
• Delete per nomination. A mess. Bob talk 08:33, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
• Delete, underpopulated, not really needed--Phoenix-wiki 20:42, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
• Delete - beat me to it. I had been thinking of placing an MfD on this for a while, but I was going to suggest this at WT:ANIME first. Oh well, what's done is done. Per above, not updated, in poor condition, and largely unnecessary. Sephiroth BCR ^(Converse) 21:30, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
• Comment - Portal:Naruto/FAQ should probably be included in this nomination also. Sephiroth BCR ^(Converse) 21:30, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

You're right. I was thinking with a portal MFD, won't all of its subpages automatically be included, or should I list them all within the nom? I think Naruto only has that one though.Collectonian (talk) 21:49, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

You probably should just list it. Reduces confusion. Sephiroth BCR ^(Converse) 10:33, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

• Delete Looking over it, I don't see that the portal is particularly necessary. Lazulilasher (talk) 22:53, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
• Delete along w/all subpages - Seemingly abandoned and unmaintained. Portal:Anime can cover this in part, topic is only just broad enough for a portal in the first place. RichardΩ612 Ɣ |ɸ 20:02, May 15, 2008 (UTC)
• Delete Abandoned portal. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 01:32, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
• Delete as unnecessary. The scope is not very large; Portal:Anime should be able to cover this. Midorihana^{~いいですね? はい!} 06:08, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
• Delete I may think this portal is inactive. I checked some links and I agree that it doesn't have a very large amount of scope. Seems also unnecessary to have this portal. -- RyRy5 (talk ♠ Review) 00:48, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.