Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Gold Coast

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete and redirect to Portal:Australia. Daniel Bryant 00:17, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Portal:Gold Coast

Created November 9, 2006 by a now banned user. Not updated since. -- Longhair\^talk 08:30, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

• Delete It's inactive, doesn't have too much importance, and violates WP:CSD G5. · AO ^Talk 17:47, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
• Weak delete it does not violate CSD G5, because it was created prior to the banning, CSD G5 says it applies only to pages created by banned users while they are banned. But delete this page anyways, it is a useless and inactive portal. Wooyi 15:58, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
• Comment - if kept, it should preferably be moved to Portal:Gold Coast, Queensland. There are a lot of Gold Coasts. Grutness...wha? 21:19, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions. -- Bduke 04:30, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nomination - I've been following this one and there seems no good reason to keep it. While idle WikiProjects can survive as they help to organise articles in case some later person comes along, I don't feel this applies to Portals. Orderinchaos 00:37, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
• Delete and then restore redirect to Portal:Australia.--cj | talk 08:38, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
• Delete and redirect to the Australia Portal. [sd] 14:47, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.